Hello again, Les. I’ve just picked up a Riley clock on eBay, in a solidly-made, vaguely art deco case. The movement seems to be a Bijou, but with a separate start knob (whereas on the Smith’s clocks I’ve seen, they’ve either started as the hand-set is released or have been self-starting). Furthermore, the stator housing has a solid back, whereas Smiths ones I’ve seen have had radial slots for ventilation. Is yours the same, please? Nick.
Nick, yes my clock is the same. The movement is unbranded but does appear to be a version of the Smith Bijou movement. However, there is a patent pending number, but none of the usual Smith patent numbers. I have not been able to locate any information about who manufactured Riley clocks.. Smith did make movements for other manufacturers and put whatever the manufacturer wanted on them.
July 1, 2016 at 2:02 pm |
Hello again, Les. I’ve just picked up a Riley clock on eBay, in a solidly-made, vaguely art deco case. The movement seems to be a Bijou, but with a separate start knob (whereas on the Smith’s clocks I’ve seen, they’ve either started as the hand-set is released or have been self-starting). Furthermore, the stator housing has a solid back, whereas Smiths ones I’ve seen have had radial slots for ventilation. Is yours the same, please? Nick.
July 1, 2016 at 3:32 pm |
Nick, yes my clock is the same. The movement is unbranded but does appear to be a version of the Smith Bijou movement. However, there is a patent pending number, but none of the usual Smith patent numbers. I have not been able to locate any information about who manufactured Riley clocks.. Smith did make movements for other manufacturers and put whatever the manufacturer wanted on them.